Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III RXD

That's the second that I bought. It says it all. At this price hardly you will get anything better

Nothing to say

Does exactly what I expected it to do, good sharp images even in limited light

The build is very similar to Canon lens, very good build, sharp, good contrast, great walk about lens, from landscape to portraits which is my first preference. And the next day service at no extra cost just.....FANTASTIC by Parcel force :D

Pity it doesn't come with a UV lens that would make it a 10 out 10 for value for money :D

F2.8

Plástic body

Nice bokeh, good quality, sharpness, excellent for portrait photo and weddings.

not good for moving objects.

good quality for the price

Well it's about a tenth the price of the Canon 24-70 F/2.8! I covet the Canon but can't justify the outlay at the moment so I ordered this and thought I'd send it back if it turned out to be a dud. It's actually a lovely lovely lens and for the modest...

It does vignette slighly wide open and the far edges are a little soft but it's no biggy for someone who shoots people in natural light mostly. Centrally it's beautifully sharp. The lens hood causes horrible vignetting under certain circumstances which...

I bought this lens to replace my kit lens to photograph indoor volleyball. What a huge improvement. The focal length is good if you are seated close to the game. If you are in the stands and want to zero in on an individual player, you will need a...

A little soft at 2.8 sometimes, but not bad at all. Anything 4.0 or higher and it is razor sharp.

easy mounting

bad condition of the zoom roll

Great value for it's price.

A bit soft at till f3,5, but tap sharp onwards.