Sigma C 28-200/3.5-5.6

Sigma C 28-200/3.5-5.6
alaAverage 4.1

38 avis

Nov. 2024

alaTest a collecté et analysé 38 avis de consommateurs et d'experts pour le produit Sigma C 28-200/3.5-5.6. La note moyenne du produit est 4.1 sur 5, tandis que les autres produits de même catégorie ont une note moyenne de 4.4 sur 5.

En moyenne, les consommateurs notent ce produit 81/100.

Résumé des avis

(Basé sur 38 avis et tests)

3 avis d'experts

Avis d'Utilisateurs  

Avertissement:

Voici une liste des avis pour ce produit ou des produits similaires. Si vous pensez que ce groupement est mauvais s'il vous plaît cliquez ici pour le drapeau.
En savoir plus sur la page de notre FAQ.
Affichage de 1 - 34 sur 38 Afficher les Avis: en français | internationaux

Avis d'utilisateur (amazon.com)

Amazon.com review summary for Sigma C 28-200/3.5-5.6

 

alaTest has collected and analyzed 23 user reviews of Sigma C 28-200/3.5-5.6 from Amazon.com. The average user rating for this product is 4.5/5, compared to an average user rating of 4.3/5 for other products in the same category on Amazon.com.

100% of the reviews on Amazon.com give this product a positive rating.

Nov. 2024

Avis d'utilisateur (amazon.de)

Zusammenfassung der Amazon.de- Kundenbewertungen für Sigma C 28-200/3.5-5.6

 

alaTest hat 1 Kundenbewertungen für Sigma C 28-200/3.5-5.6 von Amazon.de zusammengefasst und analysiert. Im Durchschnitt wurde das Produkt mit 4.0/5 bewertet, verglichen mit einer durchschnittlichen Bewertung von 4.3/5 für andere Produkte auf Amazon.de.

100% der Kundenmeinungen auf Amazon.de bewerten dieses Produkt positiv.

Ce sommaire est basé sur les produits : Sigma 28-200/3,5-5,6 DG Nikon-AF MacroSigma 28-200/3,5-5,6 DG Nikon-AF Macro

Nov. 2024

Avis d'expert par (ephotozine.com)

Sigma 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 DG Macro

 

Sigma 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 DG Macro test

Good focal range; Compact and lightweight to carry; Excellent performance through the range; Cracking value for money

Distrotion just evident

Juil. 2006

Avis d'expert par : Peter K. Burian (shutterbug.com)

Sigma 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 DL Aspherical Macro & 17-35mm f/2.8-f/4 EX

 

While a "fast" zoom lens like the Sigma 70-200mm f/2.

Avis d'expert par : photodo.com (photodo.com)

REVIEW: Sigma 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 DG Macro

 

This lens is nicely compact for it's capabilities although it does extend somewhat as you zoom to the long end of the range. The extension, achieved by a double trombone, comes out some 52mm. It does so with quite a smooth action though and the second...

Good focal range; Compact and lightweight to carry; Excellent performance through the range; Cracking value for money

CA around the edges at the wider end; Distrotion just evident

If you need a general purpose lens to carry on your camera, and use the long end as much as the wide, then this offering is well worth a look. The excellent resolution figures achieved through the middle to the long end are a pleasant surprise and make...

Avis d'utilisateur (photographyreview.com)

Sigma 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 Lens

 

Lots of verbiage about lens comparisons, most of which neglect the primary issue - does the lens deliver, consistently, a clear, sharp image. This lens certainly does - through Europe, Asia, USA, S.A. A marvel of optical engineering. I compared this...

Sharp, light, responsive

Manual focus - need to adjust eye for the split image

Juin 2009

Avis d'utilisateur (slrgear.com)

Sigma 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 DG Macro review by eyrieowl

 

This was my first lens for my Nikon d50. Which was my first true digital camera (other than 3mp point-and-shoot i'd gotten with my printer). prior to that, i'd been shooting on a venerable Canon AE-1. I had a cheapie 28-210 zoom on that body (no, I...

wide range, relatively compact, macro functionality, price

slow, not very sharp, doesn't go wide-enough on aps sensor, color cast

Août 2007

Avis d'utilisateur (slrgear.com)

Sigma 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 Aspherical IF Macro review by trentdp

 

I actually owned an older version of this lens under the Quantary brand from Ritz Camera. I originally bought it for use on my Nikon N60 but was never really excited by the pictures. I used it again during July 2006 on my D70 while on vacation and...

Cheap price for long zoom

Just so-so performance

Jan. 2007

Avis d'utilisateur (slrgear.com)

Sigma 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 Aspherical IF Macro review by awalker

 

It's a good travel lens for a FF film EOS (the reason I bought it) and it's just about OK with a 20D if you need the FL range and can only carry one lens. Wouldn't pay more than $120 these days, though, and there are better lenses out there.

Price, build quality

Noisy AF, image quality

Nov. 2006

Avis d'utilisateur (slrgear.com)

Sigma 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 Aspherical IF Macro review by nspur

 

This is the latest incarnation of Sigma's popular 7x zoom for film cameras (and full frame digital too, perhaps). It's a "twin" of the well-thought-of 18-125 for DX digital cameras and has much the same characteristics.

A nice little travel lens, better than you might think

Flare at w/a, auto-focus a little tricky

Nov. 2005

Avis d'utilisateur (slrgear.com)

Sigma 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 Aspherical IF Macro review by Allan

 

I'm new to dSLR so you have to take my review with a grain of salt. I wanted a cheap lens to play with, and for under $100 on ebay (new) I don't think I could have done better than this lens. Outside, with plenty of light, this lens performs well; it...

Light, cheap

Stiff zoon ring, poor low light focus

Nov. 2005

Avis d'utilisateur (ceneo.pl)

Szczerze odradzam!!!

 

Nie wazne czy jesteś amatorem czy starym wyjadaczem, jakość zdjęć z tego obiektywu napewno cię nie zadowoli.Obiektyw ten jest tani i moze cię skusić niska cena, ale dobrze Ci radzę nie kupuj go!!!ZDJĘCIA Z TEGO OBIEKTYWU SĄ MYDLANE I ROZMAZANE W...

cena

słabość konstrukcji

Août 2009
1
2

Comparer les prix de : Sigma C 28-200/3.5-5.6

Aucun prix pour ce produit