alaTest ha raccolto ed analizzato 194 recensioni utente su Philips HP6341 da Amazon.it. La media della valutazione clienti per questo prodotto è 4.3/5, confrontata con la media della valutazione di 4.3/5 per altri prodotti su Amazon.it.

Hoewel het ontwerp van deze Ladyshave je niet achterover zal doen slaan, raad ik de Philips HP6341 zeker aan. Het is een bescheiden superster! Mooi glad resultaat, makkelijk en snel in gebruik, betaalbaar en bovendien uitstekend voor reizen en vakantie.

Der Philips HP6341/00 Ladyshave Wet & Dry ist ein elektrisches Mono-Gerät für Damen zur Entfernung lästiger Körperbehaarung.

I loved this little shaver, easy to use and the battery life is really long, but the foil head cannot be replaced or I can't seem to find one. That is why I do not recommend. Why is this? The rest is working perfectly well and I see replacement parts...

This shaver is very easy to use - wet or dry. It is compact, which makes it good for travelling. I like the design too!

This shaver is very easy to use - wet or dry. It is compact, which makes it good for travelling. I like the design too!

I love the way it looks and how easy it is to use. I only use it for dry shave, it's great for those emergency moments when you want to wear a skirt and forgot to shave :) I take it with me when I travel and never have to worry about any other shaving...

I went traveling to Venice for a weekend and couldn't bring a manual razor in my plane carry on bag. So I purchased the SatinShave and it worked amazingly for me. I put in the battery that was included in the pack and popped in my bag. Once I got to...

lovely product to look at, the results are lovely! i love that you can use on either dry or wet skin, i have delicate skin but have had no issues with this even dry shaving ! highly recommend

I really like the design, really pretty and modern looking, I'm a sucker for anything pink! The user instructions are simple and I had this set up in no time. I appreciated the warning that initially there may be some redness but actually this was not...