Technics SA-DX950

Technics SA-DX950
alaScore 77

21 avis

Jan. 2018

alaTest a collecté et analysé 21 avis de consommateurs et d'experts pour le produit Technics SA-DX950. La note moyenne du produit est 3.8 sur 5, tandis que les autres Récepteurs et Amplificateurs ont une note moyenne de 4.1 sur 5.

Après analyse des notes de consommateurs et d'experts, de l'âge du produit ainsi que d'autres facteurs, et comparé aux autres Récepteurs et Amplificateurs, le Technics SA-DX950 obtient un alaScore™ de 77/100 = Bien.

Résumé des avis

(Basé sur 21 avis et tests)

Avis d'Utilisateurs  

Avertissement:

Voici une liste des avis pour ce produit ou des produits similaires. Si vous pensez que ce groupement est mauvais s'il vous plaît cliquez ici pour le drapeau.
En savoir plus sur la page de notre FAQ.
Affichage de 1 - 20 sur 21 Afficher les Avis: en français | internationaux

Avis d'utilisateur par: (amazon.com)

Amazon.com review summary for Technics SA-DX950

 

alaTest has collected and analyzed 10 user reviews of Technics SA-DX950 from Amazon.com. The average user rating for this product is 4.4/5, compared to an average user rating of 4.0/5 for other Receivers & Amplifiers on Amazon.com.

100% of the reviews on Amazon.com give this product a positive rating.

Ce sommaire est basé sur les produits : Technics SADX950 DVD-Audio Ready Audio/Video ReceiverTechnics SADX950 DVD-Audio Ready Audio/Video Receiver

Jan. 2018

Avis d'utilisateur par: Dominic (audioreview.com)

Technics SA DX950 A/V Receivers

 

HI guys!

Juil. 2017

Avis d'utilisateur par: Stan (audioreview.com)

Technics SA DX950 A/V Receivers

 

It has 0 hum or shhh.... on zero volume. Can be set on low impedace. I am listening in my bedroom low power stereo and sub. Also I tried it w klipsch VF-36, upgraded crossover , 2.8 Ohms impedance. Sound is absolutely clear. Better bass than new...

Juil. 2015

Avis d'utilisateur par: Toni_LI (audioreview.com)

Technics SA DX950 A/V Receivers

 

ok

Mai 2011

Avis d'utilisateur par: (audioreview.com)

Technics SA DX950

 

ok

Mai 2011

Avis d'utilisateur par: (audioreview.com)

Technics SA DX950

 

Well for what I paid I guess I did ok. Now that I've had this reciever for a while though I can truely say, "I think its total junk." How can you guys write "Plenty of power"? 500 watts? HA. I have a set of cheap $100 Altec Lansing computer speakers...

Avr. 2005

Avis d'utilisateur par: tryn (audioreview.com)

Technics SA DX950 A/V Receivers

 

Well for what I paid I guess I did ok. Now that I've had this reciever for a while though I can truely say, "I think its total junk." How can you guys write "Plenty of power"? 500 watts? HA. I have a set of cheap $100 Altec Lansing computer speakers...

Avr. 2005

Avis d'utilisateur par: (audioreview.com)

Technics SA DX950

 

Great A/V receiver, and an excellent buy. Not too heavy with bells and whistles, and those that are provided are not the best ones on the market. I've been using it for over two years with no performance failures. Plenty of power, and plenty of bass...

Nov. 2003

Avis d'utilisateur par: TheTooleMan (audioreview.com)

Technics SA DX950 A/V Receivers

 

Great A/V receiver, and an excellent buy. Not too heavy with bells and whistles, and those that are provided are not the best ones on the market. I've been using it for over two years with no performance failures. Plenty of power, and plenty of bass...

Nov. 2003

Avis d'utilisateur par: Gary1234 (audioreview.com)

Technics SA DX950 A/V Receivers

 

This is a follow up to the review I gave back in 2001. I tried to replace this receiver with a Marantz 5300 (it has DolbyII and 6.1), but after one week I returned the Marantz ... it didn't sound as sweet as the Technics and it didn't seem to have as...

Mars 2003

Avis d'utilisateur par: (audioreview.com)

Technics SA DX950

 

This is a follow up to the review I gave back in 2001. I tried to replace this receiver with a Marantz 5300 (it has DolbyII and 6.1), but after one week I returned the Marantz ... it didn't sound as sweet as the Technics and it didn't seem to have as...

Mars 2003
1
2